A report released on Sunday by a group of active-duty and retired FBI agents has raised serious concerns about the leadership of Director Kash Patel. Titled “A Pulse Check of the First Six Months,” the document, obtained by the New York Post, describes the FBI as a “rudderless ship” under Patel’s direction, asserting that he is “in over his head.”
The analysis, authored by 24 agents, highlights low morale within the agency, claiming that Patel lacks the necessary experience to effectively lead the FBI. The report notes that he “has neither the breadth of experience nor the bearing an FBI director needs to be successful.” One agent described Patel as “very personable and likable,” yet blamed him for fostering “a culture of mistrust and uncertainty among the ranks.”
Concerns about leadership extend beyond Patel, with criticism directed at Deputy Director Dan Bongino. The report characterizes Bongino as “something of a clown.” In response, Bongino dismissed the findings as “gossipy nonsense” from sources with “a clear agenda.” He asserted that many at the FBI are unhappy with the changes implemented under his and Patel’s leadership, suggesting a desire to revert to previous methods.
One anecdote from the report illustrates the tensions within the agency. During a visit to Utah following the killing of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, Patel reportedly insisted on wearing an FBI raid jacket, necessitating that agents on the ground locate one that would fit him. When two velcro patches were discovered missing from the jacket, agents went so far as to remove their own patches to ensure Patel’s proper appearance.
The report arrives amid speculation about Patel’s future as FBI director. Reports from MSNBC suggest that former President Donald Trump is considering replacing him due to dissatisfaction with the negative media coverage surrounding his tenure. In response to these rumors, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt labeled them as “fake news,” stating that the story is “completely made up.”
As the FBI navigates these challenges, the report serves as a stark reminder of the internal struggles faced within the agency and the critical need for effective leadership.
