UPDATE: A new psychological analysis reveals shocking insights into the phenomenon of ghosting, a behavior that has become alarmingly common in today’s dating culture. Clinical psychologist Charlie Heriot-Maitland argues that ghosting may not stem from cruelty but rather from an instinctive survival mechanism designed to avoid perceived threats.
In his upcoming book, Controlled Explosions in Mental Health, set for release in 2025, Heriot-Maitland examines how ghosting and other self-sabotaging behaviors are rooted in our brain’s ancient threat-response system. He explains that when someone chooses to ghost, it often provides immediate relief from anxiety or potential conflict, although it may ultimately lead to longer-term emotional harm.
Heriot-Maitland told Newsweek, “From a survival perspective, ghosting is a trade-off. It brings short-term relief by reducing immediate stress or threat, but it does so by creating longer-term harm.” This perspective sheds light on why individuals might opt for silence rather than a difficult conversation, as the nervous system prioritizes what feels safest in the moment.
The psychological implications of ghosting are profound. Heriot-Maitland emphasizes that when individuals choose to disappear, they may be attempting to manage fear, paralleling behaviors like procrastination or social withdrawal. “In the moment someone ghosts, the brain is responding to immediate threat rather than long-term consequences,” he stated. “Replying feels likely to trigger anxiety, conflict, or shame, so silence offers instant relief.”
However, this temporary safety can lead to feelings of loneliness, guilt, and damaged trust over time. Heriot-Maitland warns against labeling ghosting as merely lazy or rude, arguing that such judgments deepen feelings of shame and reinforce the behavior. Instead, he encourages a compassionate understanding of the fear or unmet needs driving the silence.
To break the cycle of ghosting, Heriot-Maitland advocates for a shift in perspective. Recognizing the protective function of ghosting—without shame—can open up healthier communication choices. “There are choices we have here,” he explained. “By helping readers recognize these trade-offs, the book offers practical, compassionate ways to reduce harm without increasing shame.”
As ghosting continues to impact relationships in today’s fast-paced digital world, understanding the psychological triggers behind this behavior is more crucial than ever. Heriot-Maitland’s insights provide a framework for individuals to engage more compassionately with themselves and others.
This urgent revelation is set to change how we perceive ghosting and its emotional repercussions. Readers are encouraged to consider how embracing these insights can lead to healthier relationships and a deeper understanding of human behavior.
For more insights on navigating the complexities of modern relationships, stay tuned for more updates from Newsweek.
Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about ghosting? Let us know via [email protected].
