The debate surrounding early decision college admissions is intensifying, with advocates calling for a reevaluation of its impact on students. In a recent opinion piece titled “The Early Decision Option Is a Racket. Shut It Down,” published on December 12, 2023, Daniel Currell criticized the early decision process as an unfair practice that limits genuine choice for prospective students.
Currell’s argument emphasizes the emotional and financial pressures faced by teenagers during the college selection process. He contends that asking students to commit to a single institution before fully understanding their options is unrealistic. Danny Tejada, a college counselor with 13 years of experience, supports Currell’s view but acknowledges the complexities involved in the decision-making process.
Tejada, who himself is a first-generation college graduate from a low-income background, has worked with diverse students throughout his career. He believes that early decision can create an illusion of choice, particularly for those from lower-income families. “The college admissions process isn’t personal. It’s a business,” he stated, arguing that selective colleges should compete for all students on an equal footing, rather than prioritizing those who can afford to apply early.
The early decision option is particularly significant in the context of financial aid. For middle-class families, comparing financial aid offers from multiple institutions is crucial for making informed decisions. Tejada insists that low-income students should not feel pressured to focus exclusively on one college to improve their chances of graduating with manageable debt.
Despite his reservations about early decision, Tejada recognizes that many students still benefit from applying through this route. He continues to assist his students in navigating the application process to ensure they have a fair chance at gaining admission to selective colleges. His stance highlights the ongoing tension between the need for equitable access to education and the realities of the college admissions landscape.
As discussions about the role of early decision continue, it remains clear that the implications of these policies affect students across various demographics. Advocates for change argue that reforming early decision practices could lead to a more equitable admissions process, enabling all students to make informed choices about their futures.
The conversation about early decision in college admissions reflects broader societal issues of access and opportunity in higher education. As stakeholders in the education sector consider the future of admissions practices, the voices of counselors and students will play a crucial role in shaping policies that prioritize fairness and inclusivity.
